Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Muskox

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2023 at 00:13:10 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. A very similar image is FP on Commons, but this has higher EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Muskox
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough focus is beheld on most parts of the visible subject's body / wool / qiviut. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral due to artifacting in background - haven't seen this before. It's visible on the file description page. MER-C 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. I suspect the bokeh on the camera didn't play nice with the branches in the background, but I haven't seen that issue often with Canon. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Charlesjsharp: Very curious bokeh, something I wouldn't expect from a $2500 RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM lens... A second-rate or damaged filter, perchance? (Edit: some samples here: [1]) --Janke | Talk 15:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]