User talk:Cheemsforever

Misleading ES

Your edit summary at LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates: "replaced link repaired broken link": This does not appear to be a factual report of your action. If, indeed, I am wrong about you, your 10+year history here, and your ill intentions, can you then explain, please? AukusRuckus (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly this is not a "stray ref" but the removal of a statement. This seems to be a new tactic: Usually, if you do not wish something to be in an article, you try stating that it is "repetitive" or "overbearing" or your version says "essentially the same" thing; all of which rarely, if ever, turns out to be correct. Others point this out to you too, but you never reply ... Why is that, I wonder? AukusRuckus (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You interrupted my message here. Hold one a moment. Now federal law as remote as it is does allow death penalty I noted it as a remote possibility on top of other penalties that you found acceptable, (fines, floggings, deportation, and 1-15 years in jail. Now 1-15 years federal laws do not trump Emirate laws so I listed 1 year minimum. As for combine statements, it's not to do anything other than combine them for keeping the information in one area and I see no harm in combining statements that seem similar to make one conhisive point. I'm replying now. I was trying to type a second ago but you adding a second statement made it so I got an edit that said you have to refresh to the newest version of the page to type. Anyway I'm here let's talk.Cheemsforever (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are a deceptive sock. AukusRuckus (talk) 07:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a stray because the statement was already noted in the combined statement where I said the three sources all feel like it can be interpreted this way and don't note enforcements that they know of. Then the rest went into a partial statement that got cut off that was leftover from the edit. It ended halfway through the sentence. You are looking too deeply in it and taking too much personal offense at my edit. I have no bad intentions. I just made the information clear and took it from multiple paragraphs that are repetitive to a statement that combines all sources and what they say. Cheemsforever (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must be so contemptuous of me and others, to think you can just do whatever you like, and no-one will see through it. So, so, entitled you must be: to know you are doing the disallowed things and then writing hand-wringing comennts about how others are mistreating you. The stuff you put me through when I was trying to discuss in a collegial way with you, prior to 2022. Uggh. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Utterly, utterly shameless. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no ill will here friend. That's all i have to say. Cheemsforever (talk) 08:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And last year?: Nothing, nothing, but ill-will. Do not besmear that good word with your deceit and insincerity. Shameless. That means nothing to someone who has no shame, I realise. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you still haven't learnt the very simple etiquette of indenting your talk page posts! As I say: Contemptuous of your fellow editors, even in such a small matter. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no deceit and insincerity. Wording I used in the message against talkpage protections and anywhere else that offended you I apologize for, even as much as I may feel upset I should regard your feelings better and not let me passion for editing get the better of me. I do have shame. Here, I'll indent. There is no rebellion in my lack of indenting. Here I did that. Cheemsforever (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your very editing here as a sock puppet of Jacobkennedy is deceptive; from this flows, naturually, that your responses are insincere: You must know it. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your indenting is still not correct, it needed one more colon. How can you have edited here for over 10 years, and not mananaged this? That's why I think you just don't care about anyone else here. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I am occupying myself here on your so that I don't think about the awful thing that happened today. My justified frustration and anger at your Wikipedia behaviour, over your very bad edits and appalling behaviour-much more minor, trivial stuff- can overpower and block out the sheer terror that will overcome me if I stop to think on the stuff that's confronting me here. So, you do have some use, after all! AukusRuckus (talk)

I can't do real edits atm because I find the concentration's going and if I stop to think what I should do, you know calmly, I start shaking. So, you know, I've got plenty of free editing time. Fun! AukusRuckus (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And all of the anti-LGBT, really vicious, stuff you follow online. URGGH! I'm not a member of that community, nor USA-ian, but geez, that's extreme: not Christian, at all.

I'd love to stop editing in this LGBT area, but I cannot put up with poorly sourced, misunderstood, and most of all, done with an ill-intentioned, POV slant, counterfactual edits. I often wish I'd never stumbled on to that first page I went to disambiguate though: then I would have been blissfully unaware of this particular kind of awfulness from which I am usually sheltered! AukusRuckus (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I again have great attentions. Sorry again. 08:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

You may not be able to tell but I am being sincere. However, any conversation not related to in wiki conversation is unnecessary. I will be hatting this I find it inappropriate. Going back on topic, the sources that are found are used. I honestly do my best and avoid having a "slant" or pov. There is no intention to be awful but I apologize if you feel that way.Cheemsforever (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't being sincere. This is wholly related to your Wikipedia editing: every bit of it. What you do with hats and so on, is your own business. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]