Jump to content

Miller v R

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by GoingBatty (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 20 November 2023 (removed Category:Supreme Court of Canada case articles without infoboxes using HotCat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Miller et al. v. The Queen
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: June 22, 1976
Judgment: October 5, 1976
Full case nameJohn Harvey Miller and Vincent John Roger Cockriell Appellants; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent.
CitationsMiller et al. v. The Queen, 1976 CanLII 12 (SCC), [1977] 2 SCR 680, <https://canlii.ca/t/1mx57>, retrieved on 2022-06-12
Court membership
Reasons given

Miller v R [1977] 2 SCR 680 is a Canadian Bill of Rights decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Criminal Code provisions relating to the death penalty were challenged as a violation of the right against "cruel and unusual" punishment under section 2(b) of the Bill of Rights.

Justice Laskin, for the majority, upheld the laws. He interpreted the phrase "cruel and unusual" in the context of its origin in the English Bill of Rights and the US Eighth Amendment, which only limited the means of carrying out a death sentence.

Some of the definition given to cruel and unusual punishments in this case later shaped the jurisprudence carried out under section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

See also

[edit]
[edit]
  • Full text available at Canlii.org [1] and Lexum [2]