Jump to content

Talk:Cuckquean

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.214.114.52 (talk) at 21:56, 4 January 2024 (→‎Some Made Up Nonsense). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Terrible

I don't know where to begin, but this page is terrible. Kultur (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great and informative article

Not only that, it got so many references! Clearly wikipedia is a superior source of information. 79.182.139.78 (talk) 16:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The references are not valid as information provided by those references is not correctly give information about what a cuckquean is.

This information also does NOT state permission/consent is required, therefore Wikipedia is encouraging and enabling men to have permission to rape their spouses by claiming they were in a cuckquean relationship.

Therefore, Wikipedia is actually liable for the traumatic events that took place in my life for almost two years now! H.A.bosslady (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a valid point that this setup must be in open form between husband and wife, in mutual agreement, and all three parties must get a kick out of it. Also the adulterer usually asks for permission so that the cuckold or cuckquean maintain some form of control.
Otherwise it's just cheating. Maikel (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with cuckold

There is absolutely no reason to keep this short article separate. FunkMonk (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree It's different from cuckoldry as the roles are reversed. It's like saying we have an article about matter, so we don't need one on anti matter. People who engage in cuckoldry are doing the exact opposite as those who are engaged in cuckqueanry.Yihman1 (talk) 01:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merger. Maikel (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need of merger. Both are different things. Polarbear678 (talk) 14:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

A cuckquean is the wife of an adulterous husband (or partner for unmarried companions), and the gender-opposite of a cuckold.[1] In evolutionary biology, the term is also applied to females who are investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own. Similar prying within a family is called wittoldry.[2] The term is derived from Early Modern English dating back to AD 1562.[3][4] 118.179.27.138 (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wittoldry

Quote: Similar prying within a family is called wittoldry. What does this mean? An example would be helpful. Thanks, Maikel (talk) 12:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some Made Up Nonsense

It is NOT known as Hothusbanding and the man is NOT known as a Hothusband. LOL! Stick to facts, instead of nonsense made up by ignorant young people who have no inkling about the facts of kinks.

Note also, that a hotwife does NOT cuck her husband. Mistresses / dommes may cuck their husbands but a hotwife NEVER does so. Likewise, the husband of a cuckquean may be a master / dom, but NEVER a so-called hothusband (again, a made up term).

Wikipedia needs to be closed down because it has degenerated into a venue for lies and misinformation. 24.214.114.52 (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]