Talk:Lepraria salazinica

Fungi: Lichens Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Stub

Howdy Esculenta. What's your criteria for deciding when an article is a stub? Mine used to be 4 paragraphs or less. Then I notice you reverted me on something about a week ago so I changed it to 3 paragraphs or less. Now you reverted me on this one which is 3 paragraphs. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should familiarize yourself with WP:STUBDEF, particularly the Croughton-London rule of stubs. This is an uncommon species about which there is not a lot of literature, and not much more can be written. Esculenta (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So stub status is determined by whether or not the article writer thinks it can be expanded further? That's surprisingly subjective. Noted though. I'll slow down on my species stub tagging. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article writer typically has a better idea of the literature space associated with an article than drive-by article taggers, so it's much less subjective than you assert. Good idea to slow down the article tagging. Esculenta (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]