Talk:OpenRISC

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It seems that some of the external references are not connected to the article. Three references to Dynalith and one to OVP, neither of which are referenced in the article. I propose (subject to comments) to simplify to one reference to each, with an explanation of their relevance in the main text.Jeremybennett (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the same applies to the See Also links. I don't think LEON, OpenSPARC, S1 Core or Mico32 belong here. They are about open hardware designs in general. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've pruned the references as suggested above. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article now establishes notability and should no longer be categorized as a stub. I've requested an assessment from the Computer Hardware task force. Jeremybennett (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

Tagged this article as low importance. -down load | sign! 22:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC) How do you decide that it is of low importance? This is one of more known soft-core architectures. It is of course a specialist subject, but in this field (FPGA/Softcore) this is an important matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.21.25.56 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]