Talk:Shape (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shape Magazine → Shape (magazine) — Common naming practice. Shortride (talk) 07:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Mhiji (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, seems like a non-controversial move. – ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The proposed name conveys the name of the topic correctly as Shape while the current name incorrectly conveys it to be Shape Magazine. Of course, shape is a homograph and so needs disambiguation, and the best way to do that is to add disambiguation information as a parenthetic remark in the title, clearly distinguishing it from the name, exactly as proposed.
I agree it's non-controversial but there's no hurry and it's probably best to let the WP:RM process run its course, rather than going ahead with the move now. --Born2cycle (talk) 20:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.