Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAO Team (2nd nomination)

BAO Team (2nd nomination)

Article about a Filipino hacking group. While the first nomination ended in a withdrawn nomination, I have doubts this group actually meets the notability requirements WP:ORG. Of the articles, only two are from reliable sources, Time-Asia, and those happen to focus on a person that just so happens to be a member of this group, rather than about the group itself. Thus, the article still lacks reliable sources, failing WP:ATT. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 18:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete just two words: vandalism and pointless DCUnitedFan2011 16:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hacking again? This is already nominated by one of the administrators as a Start-class article, what's the difference of this article with Razor 1911, Fairlight(group) and Kalisto, these group are all unverifiable. neochaosX please check the other links that are related with this group. Yunaffx 00:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment They are not aware of fan translation or warez groups, groups like these are legible for wikipedia. This is already the 3rd nomination, the 2nd one realized that everything was appropriate. Wikipedia must form localize groups in every country to verify such claims. DCunitedfan, please search for other hacking and warez groups here in Wiki, so you can see other 'pointless' stuffs. For NeochaosX, please read all the links related with this article. Can you please point out the sections that you think inappropriate. btw this article is nominated for start-class by an administrator that written/edits about 100,000 articles, he's better than us, regulars.

read the details carefully http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BAO_Team

like this one...

zephyr2k admits that she is "tey" and she's a chatter before with the hackers and carders in IRC.

Comment Guys, read my nomination again. I'm saying this group doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines because there's no non-trivial (read: more than just a single mention in an aritcle about someone) coverage of the group in reliable sources. If you can show to me that this group has been the subject of that kind of coverage, I'll rethink the nomination. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 02:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is notable for you? Please check the external links again. Your notability standards may be too high than wikipedia. *Leader of the group, kamuixtv. Posted a comment regarding Edge-9. http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=177477.