Talk:K-Wagen

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gigantomainia? Seriously?

At the bottom, it actually uses that word. Uh... I don't know whether to laugh or cry... 96.55.192.119 (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grave Misgivings About This.

Much of this information differs from my understanding of the subject. A particular cause for concern is that the reference work quoted, German Panzers 1914-18, Osprey Publishing, 2006, is by Steve Zaloga, not Eric Bass. Eric Bass didn't write the book; he wrote a review of the book, here: http://www.armorama.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index&req=showcontent&id=2013 A rather fundamental error such as that does not inspire confidence. Hengistmate (talk) 13:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]