Talk:K-10S

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Range doesn't confer immunity to AA[edit]

The article suggests that the "hypothetical" possibility of launching the missile from beyond the range of anti-aircraft missiles or guns renders it vulnerable only to fighter aircraft. There is no reason why launching a missile from a long range per se should render it immune to anti-aircraft weapons; what matters is the missile's behavior (speed, course, possible maneuvering etc.) once it enters the envelope of such weapons. Long range gives some protection to the launching vessel against counter-attack, but not to the missile itself.--Death Bredon (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]