This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
There is an obvious error in the chart "Subsidence in Coastal Cities." For New Orleans, it shows the "Mean current subsidence rate (mm/year)" as 60, yet it lists the "Maximum subsidence rate (mm/year)" for the same city as only 26. One does not need to be a statistician to know that "mean" means average, "maximum" means maximum, and the mean (average) can never be higher than the maximum, but 60 (the alleged mean) is greater than 26 (the alleged maximum). Since it's impossible for the mean to be higher than the maximum, were the two figures (60 and 26) accidentally reversed?