Jump to content

Talk:OQO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sammysunset (talk | contribs) at 22:48, 9 April 2007 (→‎Other OSs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Other OSs

Now what I want to know is- does it run Linux? --maru (talk) Contribs 00:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It can, theoretically, run any x86 OS. -Sammysunset 22:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not evolving fast enough

Looks like OQO got a head start at UMPC, however, its high cost may be its demise. Samsung, ASUS, and Founder UMPCs all look comparative but with much attractive price tag. Both intel and MS sites only list those three makers. Samsung Q1 sold out on its first day of sale.

I think the Samsung is a tablet PC, the ASUS doesn't have a physical keyboard and the Sony 5% cheaper but much larger. These things are all just toys anyway, so I would prefer the OQO for reasons I can't explain.--Old Guard 12:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chipset Instructions

RISC or CISC? --Bushido Hacks 05:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its x86, so CISC. Windows XP doesn't run on any RISC platforms... --Kiand 21:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and verb tense corrections.

Phantom Wordsmith 11:32, 5 Sept 2006 (EDT) First major grammar and wording corrections. No change to content.

Question for Discussion

The PCWorld quote is odd given the upgrades to the subsequent models, but I have no expertise to know if the quote should now be dropped. For instance, does anyone know if the unit still runs "too hot"?

Sighted in Mission Impossible 3.

Is it pertinent to mention that the OQO appeared in Mission Impossible 3?

It's at 43:50.

Keyboard commands

What are these doing here? I don't think that they add anything to this article. --Thenickdude 13:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree This should be deleted--Leon 07:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]