Jump to content

Talk:Bibliography of the Holocaust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fadix (talk | contribs) at 03:25, 10 April 2007 (→Genocide denial links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

resources

I just realized that http://www.anti-rev.org/ is missing in the list, (maybe I have not read carefuly, maybe it's there). Given that that site has a considerable amount of material, I wonder why it is not there. Am I missing something? Fadix 01:00, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ask, if you think it belongs you should add. Stbalbach 02:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have add the WWW VL Zeitgeschichte again. It's in German but one of the best sources about Third Reich, WW II and Holocaust. It is maintainded by the important Historisches Centrum Hagen and use www.vl-zeitgeschichte.de as second url. The Historisches Centrum Hagen is the host of the VL Zeitgeschichte. The VL Zeitgeschichte is no "Linkspam" [08:30, 12 June 2006 Jergen (rv linkspam)].

--Scholl 18:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have delete the Link to the *German site about the shoah This ist a German site and if the admin jergen said that German sites such as Virtual Library Zeitgeschichte are not specific "and in German", I think that is not the right place for this private page. --Scholl 15:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Aemathisphd 10:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some jackass has put "One Third of the Holocaust" in the movie links. It is a denier film.

Andrew E. Mathis, Ph.D. The Holocaust History Project

--Aemathisphd 10:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Archive Made Public

After 60 years, Nazi archives have been made public. See the CBS News report here. [1] I have added this link to resources under "Documentation and Evidence." RonCram 16:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Overlooked Millions: Non-Jewish Victims of the Holocaust" link doesn't work anymore. Is it to be deleted, or to be put into the Wayback Machine? Herindes 22:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, as (you're right) it went to a 404 page. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 22:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I notice that there are no links to any Holocaust denail sites on this page and am curious as to the reasoning why. I inquire here as a participant in both the Armenian Genocide and genocide denial articles. In the former there has been and currently is a great deal of pressure to include links to what I believe are hate sites and denying sites that are genocide perpetuation enablers (through their minsinformation and denial). Unfortunately I find myself as the lone voice opposing inclusion of such sites in the links and thus it is likely that they will be included. In addition to my belief that inclusion of such is wrong in the Armenian Genocide article I'm fearful that such could create a precident for here and in other genocide articles. So I am curious as to your rational for not inclusing such here and if it might be of help in my struggle to keep the AG article free of such filfth. I appreciate any comment or insite here or on the Armenian Genocide talk page itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Armenian_Genocide#External_Links Thanks in advance.--THOTH 15:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I should add that it is the position of at least one person on the talk page over there who is advocating that any "relevant and notable" website should be linked. IMO - if this is indeed policy - then any site - regardless of scholarly merit or facuality could or should be linked. Thus sites such as the Institute of Historical Review and such would be considered appropriate for sourcing here. You can imagine that I don't feel that this is appropriate policy for Wikipedia.--THOTH 16:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here too is an example of a position taken by a prominant editor of the AG article - "Also, I don't see what is the problem of adding "revisionist" sites, official positions in any case should remain here, I do not agree their exclusion on the Holocaust article, one wrong does not justify another." --THOTH 16:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • This page does not only include websites but also works. Had there been a section on the Armenian Genocide on works, very few revisionist books will be there since just a couple such book published in the west exist, only under 5 which are really notable. The issue is on websites, you can bring it, but consider this, Holocaust denial is illegal in various countries, and websites are regulated too, there is no such regulation in the case of the Armenian Genocide which makes an obvious difference. Fad (ix) 03:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bibliography_of_the_Holocaust&oldid=121595829"