User talk:Begocc

This is Begocc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 4 days

Rollback

Hi Begocc. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 20:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

City of Liverpool FC

Hi I am the Chairman of City of Liverpool FC. I made some changes to our pages this morning, which you have deleted.

I added words to a paragraph that itself has no citation, but yet that has been allowed to be added to our page. I was merely clarifying the club's position. I think this would fall under "right of reply" to the incorrect comments already posted.

I also deleted a very out of date squad list. But you have re-added it, even though it clearly states that it is a squad from 2022.

Can you please re-instigate my initial addition (the original comment does not have a citation). 2A02:C7C:2CB2:1300:5C4D:3539:3FA1:7D0B (talk) 13:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Reverted changes to article "Susanna, Book of Daniel"

I made a change to the article Susanna, Book of Daniel that you have reverted. The change is in accordance with the source cited, the original music score of composer Carlisle Floyd, so I do not understand why the change was reverted. I find it highly damaging to use the word "seduction" in cases of clear rape, as it instigates rape culture, and would like to know why you choose to uphold damaging practices instead of calling it out in plain sight. In the story of Floyds Susannah, Susannah is raped by the travelling preacher, not seduced, and I suggest we call rape by its name in stead of disguising it as "seduction". 195.139.201.141 (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Brown

Hello, you said I removed content and that my removal was reverted. I didn't remove any content, I added the citations that were requested in the Military section and deleted the notice that citations were needed. Is this what you reverted? Eplybon (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]