Jump to content

Talk:Eduardo Maldonado/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Krisgabwoosh (talk | contribs) at 06:52, 4 May 2024 (Krisgabwoosh moved page Talk:Eduardo Humberto Maldonado/GA1 to Talk:Eduardo Maldonado/GA1: Reverting move to match main article name.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 05:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Yo! I shall review this within one week.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 05:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the wait! I have left my comments below.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 20:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work on the changes! I am satisfied and can now confidently pass this article for GA status. Congrats!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 16:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

[edit]

Earwig says good to go.

File(s)

[edit]

Image is appropriate and has a valid public CC BY 2.0 license on Commons.

Prose

[edit]

Refs

[edit]

Spotcheck: I am using DeepL Translator to translate the text so forgive any errors on my part. Refs 3, 7, 19, 28, 36, 50, 59 and 62 are good.

  • Ref 11 does not seem to support the first sentence: "Although Maldonado's top billing on the MAS's slate of candidates significantly boosted his odds of entering the Senate, he nonetheless actively campaigned for the position".
    Removed mention of his odds being boosted. "Top billing" is still justified; the article labels him "primer candidato a senador", meaning candidate occupying the top slot on the party's senatorial list.
    Ahh I see!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 16:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • For ref 45 or 46, I recommend putting a citation directly after "a blue hand dictating the unethical actions of the ... Supreme Electoral Tribunal" as it is a direct quotation.
    Check. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.