User talk:Dawsongfg
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/220px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
Hello, Dawsongfg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Kingston Rulez (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
March 2022
[edit]Friendly reminder. You cant just use a source to come to your own conclusion. See WP:OR and WP:Synth.--Fruitloop11 (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- And the reason I don't say where it is in the source is because I haven't brought a membership or subscription or whatever to WSJ, so I can only see the first few sentences. Dawsongfg (talk) 03:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Curbon7. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Bucha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes I'm putting it now. Dawsongfg (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Mykolaiv, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawntalk 16:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- ..it's literally in the article.. Dawsongfg (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by removing information for no apparent reason, as you have done with the articles Battle of Bucha, Battle of Mykolaiv, and Battle of Donbas (2022), you may be blocked from editing. zenzyyx_talk 17:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- What the hell? The only place I removed information in less than 2 weeks ago is the Battle of Donbass, with a reason in the revision. Dawsongfg (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dawsongfg There's a trend of you removing information from articles for no and/or nonsensical reasons, as evidenced by your talk page and edit history. You've done so just recently with the Battle of Donbas (2022) article. Multiple editors including myself have had to revert said edits. Please cease. zenzyyx_ (talk) 17:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh for gods sake why do you have to put random articles. Whatever Dawsongfg (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dawsongfg Random articles? I've only mentioned a few of the articles which you have been found to disruptively edit, most recently (being 30 minutes ago), the Battle of Donbas (2022) article.
- A gentle reminder again that if you continue disruptively editing and vandalizing articles, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- no i literally went into the article history and found nothing in the first two and yes i get your point Dawsongfg (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh for gods sake why do you have to put random articles. Whatever Dawsongfg (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Dawsongfg There's a trend of you removing information from articles for no and/or nonsensical reasons, as evidenced by your talk page and edit history. You've done so just recently with the Battle of Donbas (2022) article. Multiple editors including myself have had to revert said edits. Please cease. zenzyyx_ (talk) 17:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
[edit]Hello Dawsongfg, God knows I'm not a fan of excessive rules myself, but I do not believe that a screenshot of an unconfirmed twitter account in foreign language constitute an ideal of encyclopedic source. here is your edit. Maybe you should consider waiting a few days for a better sources before adding uncertain details to the articles. Wikipedia is not a news site and it's okay if it lags a few day behind in current events. I am not contesting your edit because I'm sure someone else with more knowledge on the subject will revamp your edit sooner or later and I feel that this is still better than nothing. I hope you're having a good day. Iluvalar (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- WOW A REAL MESSAGE ON A WALL? IT'S MORE COMMON THAN YOU THINK
- All jokes aside uh it's from The Guardian? Dawsongfg (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh didn't see the liveuamap Dawsongfg (talk) 02:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kherson Oblast (Russia) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tartan357 (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- can you literally scroll up there's like 2 others Dawsongfg (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:POTKETTLE. Tartan357 (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- ok yet how is it exactly uncivil Dawsongfg (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- The part where you said
screw you
. Tartan357 (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- The part where you said
- ok yet how is it exactly uncivil Dawsongfg (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:POTKETTLE. Tartan357 (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)