From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will take on this review. Keres🌕Luna edits! 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
|
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
|
|
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
|
 ·  ·  · 
|
· 
· 
· 
