Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Steel1943 (talk | contribs) at 01:29, 2 June 2024 (Steel1943 moved page Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/-Ril- 2 to Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2 over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Undoing my recent moves to match parent page per recent developments at WT:ARB, not leaving redirects behind since the title did not exist before). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Phroziac and Doc glasgow are stating that Melissadolbeer is not a sockpuppet of -Ril-. Are they basing this statement on the fact that she makes wild accusations against -Ril-, which is an inference, or on actual knowledge that they are unrelated? I see this use of sockpuppets as a form of "theater" characteristic of ventriloquism, in which the ventriloquist uses a puppet (known as a dummy) to insult the ventriloquist (who is of course actually a puppetmaster) and make personal attacks on him. If it merely seems implausible that Melissadolbeer is a -Ril- sockpuppet, then I would suggest that the ArbCom is the judge of fact and can decide how they interpret the evidence. I request that the finding of fact that Melissadolbeer is a sockpuppet not be withdrawn. I would prefer that the ArbCom decide it. Robert McClenon 15:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]