Jump to content

Talk:Xiphodon/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SilverTiger12 (talk | contribs) at 18:25, 16 June 2024 (Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]]) ~~~~~ <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) be...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 18:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have surfaced from my long catnapslumber and have taken up the task of reviewing this article.

  • This article is stable.
  • This article has no tags or banner requesting clean-up.
  • This article is highly unlikely to contain copyvio according to Eargwig.
  • It is broad in its coverage- yes, this article likely summarizes everything known about this relatively obscure taxon.
  • It is illustrated; all images are tagged with their respective licenses.
  • Everything is cited to reliable sources, which are formatted correctly and linked where possible. There's a bunch of Biodiversity Library links for the older ones, which is nice.

Now for the hard part, actually reading the article:

Lede
  • I made some changes but the prose overall still feels a bit clunky. But the lede overall is of a good length and hits the high points of the article.

(More to come...)