User talk:Oblivy
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Western Provident Association moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Western Provident Association. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because for use by author in other articles, as discussed. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Owen× ☎ 20:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
Considering Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies, I would caution against edit warring to restore unreliable sources to Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory. You should also know better than to add promotional wording based on such a source. Wikipedia is not a platform for PR or advocacy, and phrases such as "embrace digital assets" fail WP:TONE and WP:NPOV. If you wish to defend the reliability of that source, the article's talk page would be the place to do it. Grayfell (talk) 03:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- What I did was to add sources to supplement the one you challenged, but to leave that challenged source in as I believe a note to clients from a highly reputable law firm is a perfectly valid source. I am aware that you have in the past attempted to gain consensus for the position on law firm publications being unreliable sources, but I'm certainly not aware of any consensus supporting your position.I would also encourage you to be careful about throwing around words like "edit warring" and "you should also know better". I made one revert with the edit comment that I would be making further edits shortly after that, which I did. Did that violate 1RR? And I don't agree the wording is promotional, but if you think it could be seen that way nothing prevents you from editing it. Oblivy (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Your edit on South Korea
I just reverted it. 99,720 km2 was the recalculation in 1998, 100,210 km2 was the recalculation in 2000 and 100,363 km2 was the recalculation in 2001, and has been accepted since 2010. World Factbook is irrelevant. Do you regret changing it? I will face the music (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)