Wikipedia talk:Good topics/Atlantic campaign of May 1794

Military history: Maritime / British / European / French / Napoleonic era

This page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

This page serves as a project discussion for the Good topic, Atlantic campaign of May 1794.

Appropriate discussion on this page includes:

Working definition of the topic.
Vital improvements to articles necessary to maintain status for the topic.
Potential improvements to the topic's member articles.
Possible additions to the scope of the topic.

General questions about maintaining good and featured topics can also be referred to Wikipedia talk:Good topics and Wikipedia talk:Featured topics.

	Topic milestones

Date

Process

Result

March 1, 2008

Featured topic candidate

Promoted with articles Atlantic campaign of May 1794, Glorious First of June and Order of battle at the Glorious First of June

April 13, 2010

Supplementary nomination

Added articles Action of 7 May 1794 and Frigate action of 29 May 1794

Current Status: Good topic

Working definition

This topic is about the Atlantic campaign of May 1794 and its culminating battle, the Glorious First of June - rst20xx (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vital improvements

None - rst20xx (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential improvements

The lead, Atlantic campaign of May 1794, could be promoted from GA to FA - rst20xx (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions

Commanders could be added, and this would be the most obvious direction of expansion. So could other personnel and ships, or some particularly notable subset of either - rst20xx (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]