User:Randomstaplers

Pending changes backlog
(review log)

Very low backlog

[view • purge • update]

2 pages according to DatBot 12:15, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Some articles (and a template) I've worked way too long on.

Sorry for clogging up your edit history views... WP:NOW

I actually spent time on:

N95 respirator - Wrote the history section... and another history section (the latter of which is a sh*tshow).

I rate myself... a

Respirator - Wrote out the disadvantages section, and it's readable now! (Upgrade your HVAC asap!)

Was already rated a

Dust mask - It finally makes some darn sense.

I rate myself a

. There isn't really much to add, is there?

NIOSH Air Filtration Rating - But Type A/B/C never made any sense... ever. Oh, I added two tables too.

Rated

Pretty much contains everything the end user will ever need to know. (Which IMO, does not include testing.)

Also, that TB guide from the CDC is the worst guide ever... (best case: out of date, worse case: flat out wrong) but it's the only openly available thing that can be cited on Wikipedia. At least I was willing to take a look...

Respirator fit test - Which will stay unfinished until someone with a TDA-99M edits the article.

Just guess what device(s) I own!

Definitely not worth giving myself credit for that...

And finally...

This template.

Details, details...

Personal Mistake Log.

Copyvio stats. Wasn't originally going to do copyvios, until I thought about turning an article into a GA... and well, got sucked in...

(and got sucked in even more when I saw there were copyvios from students being put into articles, and vice versa, what the heck WikiEdu!)

Copyvios: 2 fails in the edit filter, 1 with the traditional template, out of... 22-ish copyvios? 86% accuracy?

1 caught with the help of a vague ping, then doubting myself
2 others caught by me doubting myself

... uh, you be the judge on my doubting accuracy.

Or if it's just the rev-delete template... 2/15, Still 86% accurate. Seems good, but isn't too great if one were an actual engineer...

(But hey, at least we're on Wikipedia, and not building an airplane... woof.)

And Template:Current section is probably useless

Failed ping? Edit the comment and link to the user in the edit summary.

Finally, if you activate ClueBot III, don't forget to add a space...

If this ever happens to you, use the move function. Avoid cutting and pasting.

Articles to watch.

Note to self: Always read WP:RS/PS

Plus, an alternative to Google Scholar's rankings

an alternative to Beall's list on WP:CITEWATCH

Plus, a Copyvio detector.

You should Template:Excerpt as much as possible. Otherwise, have fun using Template:Copied!

Another reason to excerpt: Nobody ever clicks on the blue links. Seriously. Check the pageview statistics.

Finally, WP:CLIST.

This is why NIOSH air filtration rating#Chemical Cartridge Classifications took so darn long to complete... and the resulting table is only borderline usable...

Userboxes