Jump to content

Talk:Swordbird

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Codemonkey (talk | contribs) at 20:37, 3 May 2007 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A lot of trade created puffery here, I think. "There is no current motion picture of this work." is an unnecessary statement. All the reviews are unlinked and/or vague -"staff of Barnes & Noble". And why is Barnes & Noble's website linked? Aredbeardeddwarf 20:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taken out the statement above and the Barnes and Noble link.Aredbeardeddwarf 22:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

http://www.forumopolis.com/showthread.php?t=50596 is the forum thread that inspired the "Controversy" section. I think that it is of note, and the section should be re-added.

Forums are not a reliable source. And you're still not allowed to vandalize the page. As anyone can clearly see when looking through this page's history, a bunch of IPs have been inserting nonsense into the page, or even replacing the entire article with it, and it is pretty obvious you're part of said effort. I guess you really want that quote in, whether it is by vandalizing, or meat/sockpupetting, or blank-replacing, but I'm sorry, not going to happen. --Codemonkey 20:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Swordbird&oldid=128045697"