Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N.F. Houck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Random Passer-by (talk | contribs) at 20:54, 8 May 2007 (→‎[[N.F. Houck]]: Typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

N.F. Houck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Absolutely not notable... only published book is through LuLu.com, which means it's self-published. Links to the "author" and book has also been relentlessly spammed to a large number of articles, so existence is also self-promotional vanity cruft. See also Herald (novel) DreamGuy 19:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both N.F. Houck and Herald (novel). No independent sources cited by either article. WorldCat finds only six libraries in the United States with the book, which don't include the Library of Congress. Per WP:BK, a book not in the national library of its country of origin "most likely is not" notable. Google News Archive produces no relevant hits for houck herald hermes. The only hit for the equivalent search on LexisNexis is an 84-word piece from M2 that seems to be reporting a press release from Lulu. EALacey 19:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Herald (novel) because it's spam and N.F. Houck for non-notability. Earlier today I removed a reference from the book's article to the novel being a "finalist" in a "book of the year contest" in a "literary" magazine which was PAID to review this novel and if, as the article N.F. Houck claims, this author is "best known" for a self-published novel which has to pay for reviews then N.F. Houk is non-notable. Random Passer-by (talk) 20:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]