Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dealbreaker.com
- Dealbreaker.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The only reason for notability given in the article is that the website has been sued for copyright infringement. I don't think this alone qualifies it as notable under our notability guidelines. greenrd 02:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A non-notable blog site, with a really, really bad logo. the_undertow talk 02:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable i went through twenty one pages of msn search results from searching for this and got nothing but links to their own site--Cryo921 02:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Its sole claim to fame seems to be being sued. A google search failed to reveal notability. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 04:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable as described in the reasons above. --Nehrams2020 08:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I googled and managed to find independent references which suggested worth keeping.Hotmann 10:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)