Jump to content

User talk:Veinor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Diyitechnology (talk | contribs) at 17:32, 24 May 2007 (→‎HELP???). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing ~~~~, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here. Also, I just archived my talk page; if you're replying to a discussion you don't see here, then it's at User talk:Veinor/Archive 7. Don't edit that page, just make a new subject here and give me enough context to know what you're talking about.
If you can't edit this page because it's protected but want to contact me, e-mail me with your username and leave a message on your talkpage. We can have a discussion there.

HELP???

HI. I just want to make a page so that people knows about a company called "diyi technology." Just like a the Microsoft and other major company infomation on wikipedia. Can you please tell me what i am doing wrong so I can edit out the things that's not allowed on wiki. Thank you

Diyitechnology 16:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Steven Sun[reply]

Creating articles that read like advertisements is not allowed. Sentences such as "We transform your virtual world to reality" read like a brochure, not an encyclopedia article. Furthermore, creating a page about your company is a blatant conflict of interest and is usually frowned upon. Veinor (talk to me) 16:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


IS there a way to put our name (Diyi technology) on Wikipedia without violating any rules??

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Diyitechnology"

Question

Good Afternoon, I added an entry about Warranty Direct yesterday (5/21/07) and it was removed. The entry was created by following the format of other entries such as General Motors and Circuit City. I did not use any links, websites or phone numbers so it would not be construed as a form as advertising. Could you provide insight as to how it should be submitted. Regards, Chris

I would recommend that you not create the article. Your username (which you need to change before somebody blocks you for violating the username policy) makes it obvious you have a conflict of interest with Warranty Direct. Furthermore, the article was indeed advertising; sentences such as "You will find their auto warranties to offer the most comprehensive coverage available with one of the shortest list of exclusions in the industry" are inappropriate. Also, several passages or sentences seemed to be copied straight out of this site, this one, and other pages on the warrantydirect.com domain. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted content unless the author is willing to release it under the GFDL, which allows (among other things) arbitrary redistribution and commercial use without royalties. Also please sign your messages with ~~~~! Veinor (talk to me) 20:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Terrier Edit

Hi you removed my external link to a new site with daily Scottish Terrier news. You said it was unencyclopedic and referred me to a reference page on external links, but the reference page does not use the word "unencyclopedic."

At this point, I am interested in two things:

1. Restoring the link, which I believe meets the criteria for an external link and

2. Interviewing you for an article I am writing on crowdsourcing. You seem to have an interesting profile and I am intrigued by the role you play here at Wikipedia. Boisblaireau 20:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't reply on my talk page; I had to protect it from editing for a while. At this point, I would like to point you to the section of the external link guidelines entitled "Links normally to be avoided", specifically item 11: "Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.". I don't think that the blog was written by a recognized authority.
Regarding the interview: That would depend on how much information I have to give out. If it's Wikipedia-related stuff like how long I've been editing, what motivated me to become an admin, that's OK. Name, phone number, definitely not. I like my privacy. Veinor (talk to me) 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping you'd stop by and delete these images which appear to be parts of the vandal page in question Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 23#Image:18!!!.JPG Anynobody 09:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Algonquin 17:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]