User talk:Hersfold
|
Thank you for coming by, however please note that I have largely retired from Wikipedia. Messages left here will not receive a prompt response, if ever. Please also note that I no longer hold any access rights; if you are contacting me in relation to a block, deletion, or any other administrative action I have taken, I am unable to assist you. Please contact another administrator for help. If you do have an urgent need to contact me specifically, such as for one of my bots, please send me an email via Special:Emailuser/Hersfold. |
| ||||
| User:Hersfold/Talk Header - v • e |
A new WikiProject
Hi there! You might be interested in joining the new WikiProject, Articles for creation. Please drop in and have a look.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 02:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
And also:
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
| For cleaning up a day of backlog in Articles for creation --Xnuala (talk)(Review) 16:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! I will certainly join up with the new project, thank you for the invitation. :-) Hersfold (talk/work) 02:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey
No problem with that, I barely even worked on it.
[1] <--- my only edit to mine XD. Whsitchy 03:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Dangerous waters
I bet you know what I'm talking about :) Anyway, you will have my support when you transclude!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 00:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your RfA...
Don't feel too bad about it. My first RfA wound up being 14/14/10, so you're in better shape now than I was. The only opposition seems to be your edit count, so in a couple months no doubt you'll do fine. Just be careful about letting people know you're running... People might take it as a violation of WP:CANVASS, which could cost you support from people who normally would. Cheers, Lanky TALK 18:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's what I saw as well - I'm going to try to do more copy-edit type stuff, and clearing out the AFC backlogs should help with the "lack of mainspace edits" as well. I didn't think I'd make it this time anyway, I just mainly wanted to see where I stood. I will make sure I'm not in violation of anything before I decide to send out messages - do you think if I sent messages to everyone involved, including neutrals and opposition, that would be less biased and somewhat acceptable? Copied to your talk page. Hersfold (talk/work) 19:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Your best bet might be to just allow new people to filter in. Currently there's a lot of ill-will towards the WP:CANVASS guideline, but a lot of others are willing to take violations as reason enough for an oppose. Most of the crew who saw your RfA will probably still be checking anyway or won't be around, making the messages redundant. Anyway, have fun editing! Cheers, Lanky TALK 19:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)