User talk:TheManWhoLaughs

; Archives
	Archive 1;

Please leave a new message.

the talk page

This is my page please remain civil.

put below this line

I prolly wont read it anyway.

For discussions go to my Archive.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

TheManWhoLaughs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

207.144.215.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Goblin420". The reason given for Goblin420's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Alison (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is most definitiley a sock puppet of you. see [1]. I will also extend this block to you for use of sockpuppets to vandalise. — -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im at school right now so that probaly why i was blocked.

I don't think that's why you were autoblocked. Do you have any other ideas?--Chaser - T 19:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for a week for use of the abusive sock puppet User:Goblin420. Please do not create alternate accounts to intentionally abuse this project. When your block expires, please feel free to contribute constructivley. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the only reason i would be on the same ip ive been logged in at my school and at my local library today so its coul be anyone of those reasons the edits are different and i gave up on electro yesterday. I havent been using socks i actually like my account and i jsut got unbanned finnally so why would i try to get myself banned?TheManWhoLaughs 19:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheManWhoLaughs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because i havent been using socks. I know people might think it was me but there have been multiple people to put that on there not just me. The only reason i was on that IP was bc i was at school. Im not asking for much just benefit of the doubt.

Decline reason:

Sorry, no, the odds are too astronomical for this not to be your sockpuppet or meatpuppet. — Yamla 19:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See this edit. Most obviously a sock. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have shortened it to 48 hours. Next time it will be a week or a month. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see how thats most definetly a sock ive never shown that type of direspect to anyone on here. Im glad you shortened it and if i dont get unblocked thats fine im usually the one to blame anyway because people hate me for no reason.TheManWhoLaughs 19:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

remove

I want somebody to remove that ive used socks to evade my ban. first off i didnt use socks and second off i got accused before i got blocked. The guy that put it just wants to hole a fucking grudge and im starting to get very pissed. Accussing me of the shit is retarded. if i did it i would say i did it. Somebody take it off or tommorrow i will.

June 2007

With regards to your comments on User talk:TheManWhoLaughs: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kariteh 13:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And how exactly is that a personal attack? he put that because hes a douche. He keeps coming on my page telling me im wrong and junk. Im not a sockpuppeter and i dont appreciate being called one. I didnt make that sock but yet im getting blamed for it bc i got on my account at school. This is garbage and if you dont want to help then i would ask you to please stay off my page. Thank you.TheManWhoLaughs 13:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know. The odds that User:Goblin420, if he is completley unrelated to your activity as you claim, would edit the same page you edit warred at and vandalise a user whom you activley disagreed with on this account are about .000000000000546% or approximatley 1 in 1,831,501,831,501. Those odds are astronomical. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well then i guess i broke the odds because i didnt fucking do it.TheManWhoLaughs 14:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to argue with you. It is either your sockpuppet or your meatpuppet. We wont care after the block expires unless it happens again. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats a meatpuppet?TheManWhoLaughs 14:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]