Jump to content

Talk:Two of Cups

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 208.53.104.68 (talk) at 08:59, 17 August 2007 (→NPOV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

NPOV

Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, the tarot may not have been designed for the occult, but they are definatly used for occult purposes. I don't think that putting an occult subtag on them is POV, rather it helps someone who is searching for occult related articles to find it. Tarot definatly belongs under the category of occult even if it has other uses or origins. That's like saying it's POV to list playing cards under gambling or games. It's not, because they are both common usages.

also, I don't think we should eliminate the individual card pages. Tarot cards have a lot of interest and value individually. I think they are definatly encyclopedic.

208.53.104.68 08:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)amyanda[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Two_of_Cups&oldid=151785290"