User talk:Freshacconci
|
| October 2006-April 2007 |
| May 2007-July 2007 |
| August 2007- |
Fair use
It's wording I adapted and worked out some time ago, and generally use it with tweaks where necessary. No doubt it can be improved now. You can find it ready to copy and paste at: User:Tyrenius/Image_FU#Fair_use_rationale_for_artwork. Also check out the links at User:Tyrenius#Images.
You must state the source, e.g. URL if from web, copyright owner (or presumed owner), details of the image - title, artist, plus a fair use rationale for each article it is used in: this goes on the image page, plus the Non-free 2D art template. Justification for fair use on wiki includes free image is not available, use in critical commentary or to illustrate the work of the artist or school of art, low resolution and is not considered to prejudice the commercial interests of the copyright owner.
Tyrenius 00:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Guston
- Thanks for helping out on Talk:Philip Guston. Modernist 17:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear Freshacconci
I noticed you deleted and edited a few references through censure-methods that lacked discussions. If you can please abide through the debate and discussions provided by Wikipedia's good faith policy (since these are what such features were in place for) it'd be greatly appreciate and with your civil participation we shall enhance the Wikipedia database for the better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.86.124 (talk • contribs)
Personal attacks
Please don't take them personally. Your good work is known and recognised. :) Tyrenius 01:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I know the problem! Tyrenius 02:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Picasso
- Thanks for stepping in, I appreciate it, yeah it's a song but I hate seeing that kind of stuff, does that really improve Picasso? Modernist 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again, I was gonna comment to you yesterday about Tyrenius's message of support - don't let em get you down, but sometimes its hard. Modernist 16:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Modern Lovers song/Pablo Picasso
If the McCartney song reference is valid, then the Modern Lovers song is also valid. To snub them because they didn't have as much commercial success is snobbery. Wikipedia recognizes them and recognizes the song. It is a valid cross-reference. If trivia is not fair play, then the article should not have a trivia section.
FYI
Talk:Guity_Novin#Possible_sockpuppetry and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Artaxerex. Tyrenius 00:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I hope you undrstand
Hello Freshaccoci; I hope you've seen my apology. Thanx Vazgen 03:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
About Squiddy
Hey, I don't understand this charges in vandalism. My old friend Squiddy is a troll and a vandal. I always will revert all his reversions of my edits without any explanations. Please, revert back.--Igor "the Otter" 19:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Wimdit
Hello this is user Wimdit
Thanks for the reminder.
But i don't need your smart-alec comments.
Jokes.
Thank you anyway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wimdit (talk • contribs) 00:49, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
Main Page
I'm sorry, I thought everybody could see I was being facetious, along the order of the general mood then. 141.157.78.189 02:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry!
Sorry about those decade mishaps in those last articles I edited. I just remembered there was a rule that it was *s instead of *'s. Thanks for the heads up. See ya around.
Sytron 08:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Freshacconci, why?
I took out descriptive detail of his death - does Wilkpedians need to know that he held roses in his coffin, or his coffin was made of such wood, come on - look at what I deleted and then make a rational judgment. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.190.187.45 (talk) 00:01, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
Petition
Hi, noticed on a userpage that you had been the victim of a speedy deletion policy... Join the club! If you think the deletion policy should be reformed then sign this petition: http://www.upetitions.com/petitions/index.php?id=195