User talk:202.92.33.210
MY DEFENSE =
Actually I have been accused of vandalism by
- ALP members (or loser ALP members)
or
- loser wiki pedia monster guardians. Like those that await inside the gates of hell, these wikipedia editors shoot whoever dares upset their communist power structure - communist as in their appear socialist, but actually they are wanted to be powerful.
They even gloat how they got into the news for "burning" REAL journalists.
I will leave the comments below as an example of how they toast marshmallows
06:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Warning your additions to Children Overboard Affair are considered vandalism and your repeated reinstatement is in violation of WP:3RR, further violations may result in a block Gnangarra 03:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sarah 03:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Actually, loser, you gave me no previous warning,
and you deleted rather than editted.
The article is already labelled as being non-neutral and that is because it pushes the stupid ALP line on a spiders web to pluto but you delete any comment that the inquiry is non-neutral ? thats the problem , it was not neutral so there was never any statement to balance the "accusation". There was no defense allowed.
The entire senate inquiry was off the planet, but the article makes it look like like Peter Reith was found guilty of anything significant.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |