Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 September 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.99.4.15 (talk) at 17:21, 2 September 2007 (→‎[[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 September 2|2 September 2007]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

2 September 2007

KiloWatts

This article (KiloWatts, electronic musician) was deleted with no mention of it in the deletion review, it just disappeared. In fact, I can't find any record it anywhere. Isn't a proposed deletion supposed to end up in the Articles For Deletion log? And aren't they supposed to undergo a vote?


Red State Update

Red State Update (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

I am interested in seeing the content of this article and I have a willingness to state the article's importance and improve the article. Billebrooks 05:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now seen the article and I can vouch for its content. The first paragraph does state importance (the CNN debates), but a lot more can be done. Jeanne Moos referenced the show recently in her Larry Craig segment [[1]]. Billebrooks 06:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


As the deleting admin, I have undeleted the article after further review. How does one close one of these discussions? android79 15:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll endorse this deletion as a valid A7 (web content without assertion of notability). The "assertion" provided above is enough of a stretch that I can't blame the deleting admin for not reading it as such. No sources besides. Heather 15:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not endorse the deletion I consider that to assert something was discussed on a national news show is an assertion of importance. As the article is now undeleted, i suppose the next step would be to list it for AfD if one thought it non-notable. DGG (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]