User talk:RickK
NOTE: IF YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, AND POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE, YOU WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.'
Response for GWB wiki
Hello RickK, you recently massaged me about my correcting of the George W. Bush’s diki. I have fixed the problem with the inaccuracies in a different way. I shall see how it goes with that one. Although I do believe that unproven/fictional information does not belong in a page for facts of a person. However seeing that many wikiteers believe the information that the film presents is truth I shall seize my attempt to keep it from Bush’s page as long as my other fix remains clear.
Thanks, Lohioff
Range blocks
Hiya I saw you recent post at the village pump, and thought I'd come an teach you how you could have done it.
Firstly do a reverse DNS check to see the internet provider. If it's AOL give up. AOL is far too large, has far too many computers for you to ba able to block the vandal.You'll sucseed in blocking loads of legit users and probably won't get the actual vandal.
Assuming it's not AOL then proceed as follows,
64.12.116.10 through 64.12.117.22
Set the last digits to 0 64.12.116.0 ->> 64.12.117.0
do two /24 blocks 64.12.116.0/24 and 64.12.117.0/24 that will block a total of 512 IPs
Stick to /24 only if you are at all unsure about what you are doing. Note that /31 will block fewer than /24 and /16 will block a lot more. Never go lower than /16 ( I don't you you can in actual fact anyway) Also since range blocks catch innocents as well as vandals keep them short. Policy is 24 hours only I think.
HTH theresa knott 22:28, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Stress
You always seem to be under a lot of stress, what with dealing with trolls and vandals and people who just don't get it. Relax and have a cookie. You'll feel better (food allergies excepted). -- Cyrius|✎ 06:18, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Not blocking Gzornenplatz as Wik
RickK - the arbcom has accepted a request to look into the Gzornenplatz situation. We have issued an injuction, instructing admins not to block Gzornenplatz as a Wik reincarnation while the case is ongoing (however, his other paroles are still in effect). →Raul654 21:30, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
Michael Ross
I did not move the discussion, merely duplicated, which is not the same thing at all. I did not mean harm.Squiquifox 02:18, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Unusual articles
I reverted your revert of an anon's modification of two links. I see that anon added several copyvio's subsequently, but in this case they changed redlinks into valid links, and it seemed worthwhile to me.-gadfium 07:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism of Daily Kos
User:68.73.207.198 has thrice vandalized the Kos article. Unresponsive to warnings. I'm fairly sure you're online, and leave it to you. Khanartist 08:21, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)