Jump to content

User talk:Filippos2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wildie (talk | contribs) at 11:05, 12 September 2007 (→‎Final Warning: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Filippos2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Solipsist 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


WOW

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 15:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 19:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. --Fogeltje 09:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ADDICTION to WOW WOW MUST change it's policy by logging off users that have been logged for 4 hours long and not accepting them for another 4 hours period.

There are some clinics for fanatic players of WOW.

These are NOT inappropriate comments.

You should be blocked for trying to hide truth.

Yes, there are some people addicted in WoW. This is already discussed in the article. There is a big sections about criticism and controversy over WoW. There is a whole article about that, with a section only about addiction! Do you at least read that? If you think this is somewhat still not good enough, you sould try to improve this.
But WOW MUST change it's policy by doing what I think is a good idea is not "truth", in any sense I know. It's just an opinion. YOUR opinion.
Wikipedia is not about what YOU think is right. Wikipedia is not for your original research. It is not a discussion forum. It is not a soapbox. It is not a blog.
We don't care if you have a idea for resolving some problem you see in anything.
Wikipedia must be neutral. We can't just say what is truth. We need verifiability.
Do you have a source to support what you call "the truth"? So, sorry, for saying this, but please, stop making disruptive edits in articles and talk pages. Thanks. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 15:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to World of Warcraft, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 11:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]