Jump to content

User talk:Os Cangaceiros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Os Cangaceiros (talk | contribs) at 17:37, 19 September 2007 (LEAVE MY TALK PAGE ALONE, LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND SEE THAT YOU ARE A PRICK AND AN ASSHOLE AND THAT IS WHAT YOU DESERVE TO BE CALLED). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)

Essjay

We can't include original research and the editions you've added had both POV and OR issues. JoshuaZ 01:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Essjay controversy. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper verification. Thank you.--LeflymanTalk 01:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore this content again you will be blocked. (Netscott) 01:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Essjay controversy. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --LeflymanTalk 01:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Yet another PERMANENT, ETERNAL cyber-testimony that wikipedia admins will PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS AND BEND THE RULES when it comes to protecting their own "kind"...
You guys are LYING, but the TRUTH speaks for itself. How can it be OR or libelous when it is cited to an edit that Essjay himself published, at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)

Among other issues, Essjay never said anywhere that he was straight, so for all we know those edits were by Robbie and are completely separate (and if you think that this is about the evil admins protecting their own, I'm an admin, and I argued for keeping the article). JoshuaZ 01:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? We certainly know what account the edits were made on. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)
And do you have any reason whatsoever to think that Essjay is not gay? JoshuaZ 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Noseoutframe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Noseoutframe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]