User talk:Anwar saadat

This talk page is an acid-test of Free Speech in Wikipedia. However, due to strong language, it may be unsuitable for virgins, yobs, pensioners and narcissists between the ages of 15 and 65.

Personal Life

Anwar, I think you are a bastrad, can you prove you are legitimate son of your officially recognised father? Anwar, Mohmaad fucked a 9 year old? shame on you. http://www.petitiononline.com/heyram/petition.html

Umarup pulavar

Anwar, can you write a stub on Umarup pulavar? The next time I go to my hometown, I'll try to take a pic of his memorial. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 11:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I come across any reliable link, I will add it. Frankly, I am not terribly bothered about the dead.Anwar

Zheng He

I appreciate your contribution to Zheng He, but I felt it was necessary to revert it. First of all, the source you cited (a report at a website) did not support the sentence you added about foreign Tamil Muslims being in Zheng He's fleet. Instead, the author pointed to the presence of Indian (including Tamil) Muslims in parts of China, and this is where some of the mariners probably came from. Zheng He himself was one of these Chinese Muslims. Secondly, the website you referred to, http://1421.tv, is not a reliable source. It is possible that the specific report you cited is an example of good research, but before citing it in Wikipedia, we should establish that it reflects scholarly consensus. Remember, the standard for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability. I hope this comment is helpful. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 15:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Scouting

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Tamil script? Thanks! Chris 17:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazagham

For the last few months, you have engaged in unproductive editing at Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazagham. You have been reverting, and not participating in any discussion on the article talk page, despite other users' efforts to start a conversation. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason the block log isn't working. Just to let you know, the block duration is 31 hours. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anwar saadat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unfair block. I was reverting vandalism and wholesale blanking of paragraphs, sections and links [1]

Decline reason:

Perfectly legitimate block, and it runs out in less than 31 hours anyway. — ^demon^{[omg plz]} 14:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.