Jump to content

Talk:Exaptation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vreemdst (talk | contribs) at 09:51, 11 October 2007 (Merge: I agree). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEvolutionary biology B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revision

Starting with the intent to edit this article (per early spring 07), I ended up completely revising it. The original article lacked references and headings. Besides including those, I inserted two examples that would be understandable to a lay audience (e.g., high school students). The process of exaptation helps to explain why living organisms sometimes appear jury-rigged, as is now explained. (Related articles—preadaptation, co-option, and evolutionary psychology—will point to this article.)

Hopefully, the new structure of this article will facilitate other scholars correcting my errors & improving upon my content. (I see that TimVickers w/ a biochem background has recently improved this article. I look forward to his improvements on my changes.) W Pete Welch 01:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)W Pete Welch[reply]

Merge

Should preadaptation not be merged with this? I was originally going to propose that it be merged into adaptation, but then found this much larger article. Richard001 10:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That seems very appropriate. I'd support that.--Talionis (Shout me · Stalk me) 09:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]