User talk:Resurgent insurgent

Camp Monroe

Can I ask you why felt the need to delete the Camp Monroe page? Why is this considered advertising when there are plenty of camps listed under Category:Summer_camps. I am not advertising, I have no active connection with the camp. -TheBY 08:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was an article about a group of people that did not assert their general (not local) notability. Resurgent insurgent 12:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaotic Panorama

I want to know why the Chaotic Panorama entry, which was not finished, was deleted. —Freddy culver 19:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article did not assert the notability of the group according to WP:MUSIC. The fact that there is such a band does not automatically make them suitable for a Wikipedia article. Resurgent insurgent 22:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arms and Influence

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Arms and Influence. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

I started an undelete debate about the article, Arms and Influence. I thought that I had responded appropriately, when flagged for speedy delete. However, it was flushed anyway, without comment. —Kingdaddy8 22:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yearbook Library

The Yearbook Library should not be deleted. The Yearbook Library has high notability. Cureently,if you look back at the last page you deleted, you'll see that currently has two references placed within it at this time: The New York Times and Josten's (The famous publisher of high sc=hool yearbooks.)

However,there are dozens more I will be adding because it is a famous organization that has conducted original research, examining the role of the yearbook in modern culture. As a result of the efforts of the yearbook Library, the historic value of the yearbook is now being recognized by writers, historians, researchers and educators worldwide.

I have nothing personal to gain from championing this article, but I know how worthy this Library is, truly desrving to be acknowledged by Wikipedia.

Please allow me to continue unhindered.

Walter Day Fairfield,Iowa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.3.232 (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A single mention in NYT is not sufficient evidence of notability. Doesn't look like any other sources will be forthcoming, either. [1] Resurgent insurgent 00:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairyland

Why was the Fairyland page deleted? Granted, it was old but there was still info on it that could be used, the game just relaunched on November 1st so could you please undelete it and give us a reasonable amount of time to fix it? It would be a whole lot easier than creating a whole new page.

It is very popular in Southern Asia and has around 20k + people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.95.209 (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No sources provided to assert notability. Resurgent insurgent 00:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Mikhailoff

You might want to take another look - the reason there's no references is that it appears to be a hoax/gag. Isarig 02:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've prodded it. At the time of looking at the page, it did not look like obvious hoax to me. :( Resurgent insurgent 02:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]