Add new messages at end please

What about being an admin?

Hi IPSOS, I want to nominate you for adminship, I'm pretty sure you would be a good sysop. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators to check what are admin's roles, and let me know if it's ok for you ;-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do we go about assigning class-rating to an article?

The Kaula article is coming along (still lots of material to add) but I think it might be better than Start Class already. However, I don't know the proper procedure to have it reviewed and having its class rating reevaluated. How is it done?

I feel like I am working alone on the article. Is it a bad thing? The article might be seen as immature because most of the input is done by a single person thus lacking sufficient common acceptance. Visarga 09:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I see there was some serious disruption of the BKWSU article last night (UK time). Thank you (and Jossi) for taking the necessary steps to resolve it. Bksimonb 09:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosicrucianism

Your biteish comment at the talk page surprised me. I thought you were a much nicer chap than that remark implies. Bad mood? Feel free to disagree with the IP but it's wrong to suggest they cannot contribute without an account. And at least they were discussing a proposed change. --Dweller 21:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BKWSU page

re BKWSU page

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. --AWachowski 01:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IPSOS. You may be interested in this. Regards Bksimonb 16:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IPSOS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I was blocked. This is my first and only Wikipedia account. Where is the evidence, report, or justification for this block? I can't find any. IPSOS (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were provided with a link above. Note that meatpuppetry is also a violation of WP:SOCK. — Yamla 19:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

According to the block record, the reason given is "Abusing sock puppet accounts: Ekajati/999" I have contacted the blocking admin for you. SGGH ^speak! 19:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, um, I am not a "meat" puppet either. This AWachowski assumes that because I've insisted on him discussing his changes to Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University on the talk page, that I am affiliated with the organization or the other editors. I am not. Also, it is and has always been my policy not to communicate with other editors by email. If you check my archives, you will find that several of those editors I've been accused of being a "meat" puppet of have asked me to email them and I've insisted on discussing only publicly on Wikipedia. What kind of kangaroo court is this? IPSOS (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:IPSOS

Archives