Talk:Ceremonial deism

I just undid a reset to an earlier form. The current form unquestionably lacks some neutrality, but it has a few relevant facts that the other did not. Yes, it's too one-sidedly critical of ceremonial deism, but it does this purely through mentioning a few objective facts with no rhetoric. In order to restore neutrality, more such objective facts that could support the pro-ceremonial deism stance should be added, rather than censoring the opposition.