Jump to content

User talk:Animum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carlydow (talk | contribs) at 00:13, 11 December 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome to Animum's talk page


Template:Usertalk footer



Count

Does your count.js work? Because I don't get anything... is a new tab supposed to appear near watch etc. with the name 'edit count'? -- Mentifisto 09:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should see a new link in the toolbox saying "Edit count" when viewing user, user talk, or contribution pages. Regards, —Animum § 01:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything. :-/ -- Mentifisto 22:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It should work now. —Animum (talk) 01:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ermmmm, Animum dear, would you mind rolling it back? lol. For some reason, when you changed it to open in a new tab, now it isn't using Kate's, it is using mediawiki or something. Odd. Sorry! Ariel♥Gold 06:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing; I just like query.php because it's so much faster. :-D —Animum (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it works now... what was wrong though? And about query.php... it is fast but is it normal for it to remain unformatted? And, well, for me now wannabe kate is displaying a 403 error when I click the edit count link (and any other link it seems today). -- Mentifisto 20:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The toolserver has crashed again. >:-| I'll keep it as query.php (it's supposed to remain unformatted unless you specify a format in the url [i.e., "&format=txt"]). —Animum (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, I forgot to read the doc in the link it provides, and thanks for that indentation information, I was just recently wondering about that... so, thanks for everything, that edit count link is useful. -- Mentifisto 20:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Any time. —Animum (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ariel not understand code speek! :D So, I guess I will just ask, how come at first, it was using Kate's, then, it was using the link above, and now, it is using something totally different, that's neither one? Am I doing something wrong? How can I get it to go back to Kate's, lol. Ariel♥Gold 21:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Animum not surprised. :-D :-P All jokes aside, the toolserver has broken again, so it's back to query.php for the most part. The link above is a differently-formatted version of the default query.php output in a more easily readable (in my opinion, at least) format. If you really want to use the wannabe_kate tool, however, replace importScript("User:Animum/count.js") with the following.
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
        + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Animum/count.js'
        + '&oldid=176853947&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

—Animum (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's it mean, "toolserver has broken"? Don't a lot of bots run from the toolserver? I realize that Kate's sometimes goes down for short periods of time, but it is normally back up within a few hours, right? Is Kate's running from toolserver? What happens to bots that are running from there, if toolserver goes boom? lol. Yeah I guess I could hop on IRC and ask you these silly questions instead of filling up your talk page, but I actually have to do some non-wiki "work" (~*gasp*~) today, and if I go on IRC I'll never leave, lol. Anyway, thanks for telling me how to change it. I guess it is really no biggie, you're right, the other one is way faster, and I do have a link to Kate's in my cheetsheet subpage, so no big deal. ~*Grin*~ Ariel♥Gold 21:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think some of the bots on the toolserver can be run locally (i.e., from the bot owner's computer) in the case that it malfunctions, but some IRC bots (such as MiszaBot, which runs from only the toolserver) have been broken for some time now. Yes, the wannabe_kate tool is run from the toolserver. And no, I don't mind at all if you ask your questions here. —Animum (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Clown (album)

I'm wondering if this shouldn't be moved back to The Clown, since clearly the character from Camp Blood is not a significant enough usage of "The Clown" to warrant even a disambiguation page. Wareh (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a simple note to the top of the page (in case anyone gets redirected there from The Clown) to see Camp Blood for the movie character. Regards, —Animum (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas

May your days be merry and bright, and may all your Christmasses be serious beak bustin! I'll bust your beak! (time for some beak bustin'!) 01:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmative, sir. May yours be equally filled with beak busting. :-D —Animum (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

hello, Animum! I have seen the box "A Status Bot says I am: Online" at your userpage... I would like something like that, too... So I added Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot to my userpage. But what have I to do now? Could you help me? That would be very nice. Best regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just add {{User:StatusBot/Template}} to your userpage. :-) Regards, —Animum (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks, done. I have another qestion: How does the bot know wether I'm off, or on? Can I configurate that in any way? Regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think it tracks your edits and if your most recent one was made recently, the marks you as online. —Animum (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks a lot. —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Any time. —Animum (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ...

...for reverting vandalism on my user page. Jackaranga (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! —Animum (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Animum, I'm new to the wikipedia world and I'd like to write about a company in San Francisco that does some really cool work in employee engagement. My original page was deleted for not being "notable", though I hardly had enough time to site secondary sources etc. What do you recommend I do to make the material more suited for the wikipedia community? Thanks! ~carlydow

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Animum&oldid=177101289"