User talk:07fan

Mesopotamia

In the ancient history and before the Rise of Persia, Mesopotamia conquered some parts of the west Iran just like they conquered Sham (Syria modern Day), but they are weren't originally Mesopotamia, so west parts of Iran is not originally Mesopotamia, beside your sources are weak. Mussav (talk) 07:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You are wrong

You have weak sources, I just posted strong sources the British museum, the New York museum and Mesopotamia official website, and I will report the mod if you continue editing it. Mussav (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop

Stop ruining it, I put strong sources and you removed it ??!! I'm reporting the mod. Mussav (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Read before posting it

You're sources say "Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Kassite, Neo-Babylonian, and Assyrian invasions periodically crossed Khuzestan" so Khuzestan it wasnt Mesopotamia in the 1st place, it conquered by Mesopotamia just like Mesopotamia Conquered Sham, Egypt... etc and about the maps, of course it will shows Iran, Syria, and Turkey too.. because Mesopotamia surrendered by those countries. Mussav (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

official warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Mussav Mussav (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Do you think we are playing game here? this is knowledge and you are posting wrong information, I hope you face your guilt. Mussav (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule violation block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Mesopotamia. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sam Blacketer (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Sam Blacketer (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi User:Tajik

I wanted to ask you how you felt in the last days? *lol* 85.178.166.158 (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

excuse me...who are you and who is Tajik...07fan (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Tajik is the one to whose version you always revert. so Tajik must be you. It will be interesting to see when you will be discovered again as being Tajiks sock puppet as your earlier sock puppet User:DerDoc has already been discovered. I see you try to play another "character" as "07fan" (a more cool one) but it is impossible that you always make the same edits as Tajik (or his dynamic ip 82.83.xx.xx) 85.178.162.50 (talk) 15:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

number

Answer: because the number was wrong. And it is wrong again now thanks to your revert. Ulug only ruled for two years. Before that his father Shahrukh was ruler. Also in Samarkand, but he is only listed under Herat in the list. 75.178.177.135 (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Have a look at Shah Rukh (Timurid dynasty): his father died in 1447 and he was viceroy (and astronomer of course), not king until then.

(Merry Christmas!)

nl:Gebruiker:Jcwf 75.178.177.135 (talk) 06:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

For his father I have an old,old ref. It is public domain now and dowloadable from the internet