User:TheNewPhobia/Complaints

Before complaining, please click the + above and supply a diff! If these are not provided, I will ignore your complaint.

I edited the page for the Australian Order of Precedence- following the Labor Party's win- and all my changes were reverted. Please explain why.

I find that your decision to tag Martin Meenan for Speedy deletion was wholly uneducated. Ryannus (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, calm down. I use Twinkle, and sometimes I click the wrong button, and sometimes I'm in a rush. So, I'm sorry. And, next time, please try to be just a little more civil. Thanks, and bye! JöиÁ †ĥăИ — Quality, not quantity. 00:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Scott Horton (lawyer)

I also disagree with your decision to tat Scott Horton for speedy deletion.Athene cunicularia (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Heraeus

Hi Jonathan, you have deleted my changes at the "Heraeus" Article. Could you please explain me why. It only contained a link to the Heraeus Corporate Website. The new article is significantly better, I would like to re-enter it. Thank you, Simon --Sloebel (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Black (album)

Ok, I left a message for you yesterday on your talk page and you seem to have ignored it, so I will ask you here. Please can you let me know why you reverted my edit and accused me of vandalism, even though I was being bold and deleting 1) listcruft, 2) included an edit summary and 3) explained edit on the article talk page? Also why you have not replied? Many thanks Sue Wallace (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bicentenial Man revert...

I re-edited this page because I was inadvertently logged-out on the first edit. Also, the edit was not substantially different from the existing text, merely a bit shorter and clearer. I would greatly appreciate it if you would summarize the plot, as I could learn from you. Have a Happy New Year, thank you, Shir-El too 05:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this. You didn't follow this policy, which is why I had to revert. Sorry! Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 16:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messenger Plus! references

What I meant by the comment concerning the change I made was that the reference couldn't be valid. The section talks about complains being made and a solution being done at a later date. The referenced complains are one year older than the actual solution as listed in the article (solution done in 2005, references complains are in 2006).