User talk:Smashville

Christian Martial Art

Thanks for going through his other pages and reviewing them for CSD criteria. I didnt even think of doing that for some reason. RogueNinja_talk 19:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

That's why I'm here! --Smashville^BONK! 19:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Malakov

At Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_December_24#Daniel_Malakov you wrote

I'm having an issue with the nominator's accusations of bad faith against admins for doing their duties as admins. And with the essay length responses. Be concise, please. --SmashvilleBONK! 23:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you would kindly explain

• Why do you believe that Wikipedia Administrators should be immune from legitimate criticism? Do you have any sources to support this point of view?
• Why do you believe that a cogent set of arguments must, a priori, be concise? While brevity is the soul of wit, should not Wikipedia emphasize accuracy at its expense?
• Since you entered into this discussion of your own accord, I do not think it out-of-line to ask the origin of your UserID "SmashvilleBONK!" which seems to connote a violence act. Do you believe that there is a place for violence among Administrators on Wikipedia, perhaps figuratively? Do the ends justify the means?

Eileivgyrt (talk) 14:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Response at DRV. --Smashville^BONK! 16:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for the explanation... at User:Eileivgyrt; you have to admit it sounds edgy.

Eileivgyrt (talk) 21:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Deaths in 2007

• i don't think reversion of vandalism is covered by WP:3RR, actually. cheers, tomasz. 18:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
  • No, but I don't think alphabetical order constitutes "obvious" vandalism...although the edit summary kinda does show there's no intent of stopping. I'm only reporting User:Simion Eugen-Andrei, Bucharest, Romania. --Smashville^BONK! 18:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
    • i see your point. thanks for your judgement, and i will take more care of it in future. tomasz. 18:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
      • There's never a problem if you're working in good faith, which you obviously were. It's also obvious he's making bad faith reverts... --Smashville^BONK! 18:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Wednesday Night Drinking Crew

Hello i was curious about the SpD set on the WNDC Article

The reason below is why I personally think it should be included, It truly is all that I say.

I am a representative of the MBAHA. Though this is my first entry and I'm not sure if im even doing it correctly or what needs to be done to establish this group in world history. Like I state below it is a huge part of the Myrtle Beach economy and many notable persons in the area are members, and they also start and coordinate fund raisers for High Schools and County affairs. Also it's 854+ members strong, their meetings usually involve around 175-200 members in attendance.

Please respond and let me know how i can improve the page.

• This page should not be deleted because enough though it does not have a notable effect of the entire history of the world, it does for the population and economy of the Myrtle Beach area. It supports family, social, and personal affairs. You even must be apart of the hospitality industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fivesecondrule (talk • contribs) 06:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, for starters, it didn't even remotely explain how it was notable. Honestly, though, I highly doubt this page would survive any Wikipedia deletion process no matter how well written. --Smashville^BONK! 06:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Also, recreating it immediately like you just did is probably going to end up getting the page salted. --Smashville^BONK! 06:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Not trying to doubt your knowledge of Wikipedia and it's procedures but seriously there is not one single organization or group that is localy operated listed on WP?? Also i really didn't try to recreate it but when i was editing it, there was a notice saying it didn't exist. I thought i was suspposed to click the recreate to enable my editing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fivesecondrule (talk • contribs) 06:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
      • There are tons, but you haven't even asserted that it's notable. --Smashville^BONK! 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
      • Well there is alot that I'm not really able to put in at one sitting, especially since it keeps being deleted, can you at least post-pone deletion for a week or so?

But as stated how is being a "huge part of the Myrtle Beach economy and many notable people in the area are members, and they also start and coordinate fund raisers for High Schools and County affairs." not notable?

What do the other organizations have listed? They certainly contribute loads to the city and the people who live in it. By the way i do appreciate the speedy response and help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fivesecondrule (talk • contribs) 07:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Wikipedia has over two million entries, but they all have to pass the Wikipedia notability standards. --Smashville^BONK! 20:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WPPP-LP

FCC licensing is not mentioned here. What else makes it notable? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• WP:OUTCOMES says that licensed stations are seen as notable if they have original programming...WP:WPRS has several debates over the notability of LP stations. CSD A7 says it doesn't apply to controversial deletions. --Smashville^BONK! 20:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Agreed. I won't push for speedy; and I'll wait until notability criteria can be presented by the author. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Landaluce

Why thank you! I don't often receive compliments...much the reverse. But I agree, when I saw her missing, I got to work. As a horse lover, Landaluce should not be forgotten.JiggeryPokery (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wenonah Article

Thanks for fixing it up. Try to keep me posted on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 5dsddddd (talk • contribs) 00:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

• I can't guarantee it will get kept, but I think I gave it enough context so it won't be speedy deleted. --Smashville^BONK! 00:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, Smashville, just before I got your message I was thinking "I better take this to AFD." Beat me there! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

A7 and schools

Thanks for stating that schools aren't part of A7 - I've been trying to go over all the policies really carefully and I guess there's still a lot that I've missed. Pnswmr (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

• It was actually a recent change...so you can't really be blamed for missing it. --Smashville^BONK! 01:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Powercore

In response to me not being the original author and such, please see this edit, where the original author indeed did request the article's deletion. ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I see you reverted your edit - sorry for the slow response! ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Ha...yeah...I felt kinda dumb when I saw that... --Smashville^BONK! 02:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I Am Sorry, I Thought That Victoria Planned to release the album and i will quit now sorry. thanks x —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girls alouds biggest fan (talk • contribs) 05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

• Considering how many times you've been told to stop, I'm sorry if I have a hard time believing that. --Smashville^BONK! 05:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I Know, But I Just Want To Create Sourced Articles

I Don't Mean To Be A Pain, but I Try to source my articles like i sourced all my Victoria Beckham Articles , but I Don't Understand Why People Delete It. Also I Want To Be A Journalist, so your lucky to be one :P. So I'm Sorry if i've been doing something wrong and I Will Learn By My Mistakes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girls alouds biggest fan (talk • contribs) 05:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)