Talk:The Geranium
Appearance
Novels: Short story Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Excessive "further reading" notes. More article, less references that do not reference anything --Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's a stub that has existed for 10 minutes. Give it time. The comprehensive list of sources provides editors material with which to build the article, ensuring that the stub will one day develop into a full article. As for the reader, it's better than nothing. Wounder (talk) 05:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand. However, you may wish to move the bulk of this list to this talk page; that is the recommended procedure for including potential future reference material. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't wish to. The references serve as a starting point for the reader's own research until a full article is written. I'm not sure what you are hoping to accomplish by slapping a vague cleanup tag on a newborn stub. I repeat: newborn stub. Your time here hasn't been constructive. Wounder (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)