User talk:Aitias/archive

Thanks!

Hey there,

Thanks for reverting that vandal on my user talkpage.

Cheers,

Perfect Proposal ^{Speak Out!} 01:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (Warped Tour 2008)

Thanks for the help with Warped Tour 2008, it seems like the idiots only come out after I've made a huge amount of changes to the page. I already reported the IP since it's obvious that person is only here to mess things up for everyone else. DX927 (talk) 01:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

Trusilver would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Trusilver to accept or decline the nomination. A page will be or has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aitias . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

I would like to thank you very much for your trust, Trusilver. :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The game's afoot, good luck :) Trusilver 01:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Sins of a Solar Empire page

I removed a section on the game's beta that has been superseded by the fact that the game is now gold and is released retail in 2 days. The beta section was pointless and irrelevant since all it did was list the dates of the previous beta versions of the game and how to get into the beta. Maybe you should change your message so it doesn't accuse helpful people of vandalism. 66.26.82.58 (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please use the article talk page. Regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Haven't seen a response from you. I was making a good faith change to a page. It was not vandalism and I do not appreciate being accused of vandalism.66.26.82.58 (talk) 14:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting unsigned comments

Sure, I would do the same. But your statement says that any unsigned messages will be reverted, and that's what sounded unfriendly to me! By the way, do you archive your talk page? I couldn't see a link to it. Regards, MSGJ (talk) 16:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Every time I archive discussions you can see that in the page history - I write "archived." in the edit summary. :) Kind regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but where is the archive!? MSGJ (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no archive ;) You can see the old discussions in the history - I tought it would be enough to archive discussions in this way. Isn't that okay? :( —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not normal. I don't know if anyone will object. See WP:Talk_page_guidelines#When_pages_get_too_long. MSGJ (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your efforts in cleaning up vandalism. Huba Huba American (talk) 21:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOVEFiLM

Why did you revert my changes - just because I forgot to add an edit summary? I have been making some edits to improve the page too, like adding names to the references. It seems a bit heavy-handed. Is there a way you can revert the reversions? AndrewRH (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry. As I see, you already undid my revert. Kind regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 14:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Journal

It appears that someone may be using your account to vandalize, as evidenced [here]. Not quite sure what's going on here. -anabus_maximus (Talk to me) 23:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey anabus_maximus. No, my account wasn't hjacked. :) That was just a mistaken revert. Kind regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 00:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Just was wondering. I have definitely seen my share of mistakes. Happy editing -anabus_maximus (Talk to me) 04:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Jews article

There is no reason to put the family names of jews in the community. It is an invasion of their privacy and does not help anyone except maybe somebody interesting in committing a hate crime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.111.88 (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please use the talk page of the article. Regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone there and reviewed the other comments and made a post. However, it does not look like action is taken from that page. What do we need to do in order to remove that section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.111.88 (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have to wait a bit, so that other editors can say there opinion. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How the donkeys....

Do you use a program installed on your computer or just in monobook? I'd love to know - you do so many edits! Tiddly-Tom 18:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiddly Tom. I use WP:HUGGLE. :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

Thank you very much for removing the vandalism on my talk page. I've never had any dealings with that IP before, so I have to admit my surprise that I was targeted. Thanks for getting rid of it so quickly. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Henry is gay

I did not make that. I think one of my friends did when I left my account signed on. Most of my edits are helpful. KingsOfHearts (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your reversion of deletions to entries on Philip Zelikow

Please leave the deletions to the material on Philip Zelikow until an impartial group of volunteers is prepared to write something that is reasonably accurate. The site should not repeat defamatory allegations that are untrue. The material that has recently been added makes an already unbalanced and distorted entry even worse.

Civilities