User talk:KrakatoaKatie
 | I am on indefinite wikibreak for personal/family reasons, although I'll appear intermittently to help backlogs and distract myself from real life. Messages left here may not receive timely replies. If you have a problem with an admin action of mine, see my talk page for help. |
| Thanks for visiting my talk page.
If you are considering posting a message for me, please observe Wikiquette: *post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the five rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
Talk archives
|
about a deleted article
Dear K.K., you wrote the conclusion of the VfD of an article - did you observe that many of the reverted opinions (from keep to delete or the < strikethrough > of the reasons for "keep") were done by the same user who initiated the VfD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Itointegral - and that the initial contribution of that user (his only contrib to article space), namely the phrase about "compact support" added in a math article, is simply wrong. I don't know what the article was like, but I think the person certainly meets more than one of the criteria given in Wikipedia:PROF - in particular, SCOPUS (suggested as "the best way(...)" on Wikipedia:PROF) returns over 200 hits, which is very much in the field of mathematics. — MFH:Talk 20:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- It would help if I knew the article about which you're writing. - KrakatoaKatie 15:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review for Leo J. Meyer
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Leo J. Meyer. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
I read above that you are on an indefinite wikibreak, so I apologize that I have not had a chance to discuss this DRV with you. I believe that notability and verifiability were established, and stated as much in the DRV. Mrprada911 (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey there!
Plz don't add stupid things to Roosevelt's article... especially cuz I need it to do a research :P Max —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max0005 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding to Opinoso
The reason why I posted User:Opinoso at WP:AIV because he provoked me to do a personal attack by calling me racist in Talk:Italian settlement in Argentina, which I remember it is a violation of WP:NPA. I get the blame, yet Opinoso does not. I feel I am being ignored. And why am I being reported again, I did nothing wrong this time. Lehoiberri (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
re: agel article
I saw that you deleted an article I posted today regarding Agel. Until today I had not heard of this company. When I attempted to find info about it on Wikipedia (always my first stop) there was nothing available, so I did some research and took the time to follow procedures for adding a new article. Your reason for deletion referenced "advertising". This is odd since I listed references for any statements I made about the company, and the list of products the company sells does not make any endorsements other than to list what the company claims each particular product does (if you made an article about Flintstones chewables, I don't think it's advertising to say it is a "multi-vitamin" or that it "proposes to improve health"). If you could please go into further detail about which statements you found to be "advertising", I will certainly do what I can to make any needed changes.
I tried to look up this subject because I was trying to help a friend who came to me for advice and I didn't know anything about this company. I was sure that it would be on the list of MLM's (which I not only read, but read the individual company reports for to see examples of objectivity on such companies). When it wasn't, I did what we are all supposed to do for Wiki and that is roll up our sleeves and try and make it comprehensive by doing our part.
I look forward to your response.
vaylen