User talk:Porqin

	Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Current Discussion

Please tell me which specific words or phrases or sentences that triggered the total reversion of the site that we are trying desperately to upgrade http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Technical_High_School With great humility, as a first-timne editor (on behalf of so many contributors for this entry), I await your guidance and coaching so that we can successfully edit.Brian Laishes (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Brian Laishes[reply]

Thank you for you feedback. I have discussed this with my colleagues and we believe that we will NOT continue to post information on Wikipedia, but, rather, use 1 or 2 new dedicated websites. In the meantime, if you want to revert this site back to the original, please do so. As it stands, it is a very very incomplete and literally erroneous contribution to Wikipedia. We will attempt to use encyclopedic language to improve the presentation and later, once our public websites are completed, reference them as links for further reading. I presume that my added material will be preserved under "former edits" such that I can retrieve the material for transfer to our new websites that are under construction. Brian Laishes (talk) 20:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Brian Laishes[reply]

On second thought, I JUST completed a total cleanup of the Ottawa Technical High School entry. Please note that it is a work-in-progress. If you decide to accept it, then I/we will continue to keep it encyclopedic, and interesting. I am hoping to add better and more interesting photographs, and I think I had to wait 4 days so that the GFDL can become active? Am I correct? If you note any additional unacceptable phrases please tell me specifically. Thank you for your help. Brian Laishes (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Brian Laishes[reply]

Re: "HAGGAR" vandal

Hey thanks for requesting it and letting me know. I was just going to do it myself.... Keep up the good work :) Thingg^⊕^⊗ 01:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why...

Why did you revert my edit to your user page?

It IS accurate information. I can gladly provide some more proof if you're not satisfied.