Film: Chinese Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Goof not a goof...

The article lists the spinnign dog tag as not having the correct numbers (and being read out whilst spinning) as being a goof. Yet surely that was the whole point of the scene (note: I've not seen it in a few years)... ie, that the 'real' number is only revealed as an illusion generated by spinning the tag... ie, what described is not a goof, but the whole point of the scene? --Nemo 00:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It wasn't a "goof", nor was it particularly notable (in comparison with things like the wind tunnel, the zorb escape etc) and wouldn't have enhanced the article even if it had been accurate. And anyway a "Goofs" section isn't really appropriate for an encylopaedia. As such I removed it. Gram123 14:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Audio Versions

There are two different english audio versions of this great and excellent movie. The first english dub is the excellent cheesy one and the second is a newer english dub which is more boring. If anyone has any excact information on this, it would be nice to update the article with it. b0ef November 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 10:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zorb ball

In another article sphereing, the company Zorb has been editing around the article to look like an ad for the sphere product. I think that might have been done here as well, particularly since the movie predates the company (as pointed out several times in the discussion there). Sorry to bring up this minor point up, but I think this should be addressed.

69.120.31.34 (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]