Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lilian Ladele tribunal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BFG1701 (talk | contribs) at 19:14, 15 July 2008 (Creating deletion discussion page for The Lilian Ladele tribunal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The Lilian Ladele tribunal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

1) Breaches WP:NOT#NEWS. Article is just a stub cobbled together from newspaper snippets.

2) There is no such specific artifact as The Lilian (sic) Ladele tribunal: it was a standard, unnamed employment tribunal, consequently, invented and useless search term.

3) POV in that it gives details only from Ladele's side of case.

4) Really sloppy research - she's Lillian not Lilian: originating author advised, but...

5) This case already covered more accurately and with balance in the Christian Institute article, the appropriate place IMHO.

In summary, pointless search term, POV, bangs up against WP:NOT#NEWS and regurgitates information better written and placed elsewhere. BFG1701 (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]